ESTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 15.68%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.59, signalling upside risk potential of 34.05%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $354.08 which suggests that it could grow by 32.66%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Salesforce.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.665%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 41.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.82x versus 6.71x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 36.86%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.59, signalling upside risk potential of 34.05%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $513.34 which suggests that it could grow by 7.2%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Microsoft.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 37.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.82x versus 13.25x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 21.55%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.59, signalling upside risk potential of 34.05%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $208.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.3%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Oracle.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.494%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Oracle's PE ratio is 46.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.82x versus 9.98x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -4.22% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of -41.27%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -13.2% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $111.59, signalling upside risk potential of 34.05%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $227.04 which suggests that it could grow by 7.46%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Snowflake.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.070, which suggesting that the stock is 7.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $388.4M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$16.4M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 5.82x versus 18.29x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.